Trigger and endpoint.
Define purpose, start condition, completion, customer, supplier, scope, and exclusions.
01 / Services / Defined Process Map
A bounded current-state map for one clearly defined workflow, validated with the people who perform it.
Capture the trigger, inputs, steps, decisions, ownership, handoffs, exceptions, controls, delays, records, and outcome that make the process what it is.
Defined Process Map / Starting at $1,50002 / The premise
The map creates a shared operating artifact before automation, SOP writing, training, or redesign begins.
03 / Operating signals
04 / The operating question
Formal procedures often describe intent. Performers know the real sequence, workarounds, waits, decisions, and rework that occur in practice. This engagement establishes one bounded process as it runs today, then validates the model with relevant stakeholders.
The four questions are deliberately blunt. Most process documentation answers the first and the last, then leaves the middle to assumption — which is exactly where cost, delay, and rework accumulate.
A map that records only the approved route is a description of intent. A map that records the waits, the returns, and the informal authority is a description of the operation.
05 / What a finished map looks like
Below is an illustrative current-state map: a customer request moving to order fulfillment across six lanes. Note what a conventional flowchart leaves out — the two-day supplier wait, the manual status update, the exception path to an alternate supplier, and the loop back for more information.
06 / What becomes visible
Define purpose, start condition, completion, customer, supplier, scope, and exclusions.
Capture activities, decisions, waits, loops, approvals, and standard sequence.
Identify the people performing, approving, receiving, escalating, and closing work.
Record workarounds, rework, handoff problems, delays, controls, and missing information.
07 / Method
08 / The deliverable
09 / Service ladder
10 / Clear boundaries
Current-state mapping comes first. Future-state design, SOP development, automation, and implementation are separate scopes unless explicitly included.
Price varies with process depth, stakeholder count, evidence, systems, branches, field observation, and reporting requirements.
11 / The investment
The entry point to the mapping ladder. Scope varies with process depth, stakeholder count, evidence, systems, branches, field observation, and reporting requirements.
// ONE BOUNDED PROCESS / CAPTURED AS IT RUNS / VALIDATED BY THE PEOPLE WHO DO THE WORK
12 / Common questions
No. It includes scoping, performer-led discovery, current-state capture, validation, exceptions, ownership, and editable source. A flowchart shows the approved route; this records the waits, returns, and informal authority that the route leaves out.
Yes, and known decisions, delays, rework, exceptions, handoffs, and controls within the agreed boundary. The happy path alone would not be worth mapping.
The baseline is one clearly bounded workflow. Additional processes or expanded boundaries are separately scoped.
Two consolidated correction rounds are included. New branches or material scope expansion may change the investment.
That disagreement is one of the more useful things the map surfaces. The draft is walked with the people who perform the work, and where accounts differ the variants and assumptions are recorded rather than quietly resolved.
Start here when the work sits inside one team with a manageable number of branches. Move to the Cross-Functional Map when the work crosses several teams, and to the Complex Process & Responsibility Map when authority, variants, and exception paths are the difficulty.
13 / The decision
Bring the workflow that is important enough to map and simple enough to begin.
Start the conversation →Starting at $1,500 One bounded workflow
Talk to us